Skip to main content

Demo 5

Nested timeout

A timer created inside a timer waits for another task turn.

fully simulatedcurated scenariodoes not execute real code
Short answer

The key output order is sync -> outer -> inner. The inner timer is not eligible until the outer timer callback has finished.

Real-world bug this helps solve

Console output or cleanup runs in an order that does not match the source code order. Nested timers are common in retry loops and staged UI updates.

Common wrong assumption

Thinking nested async work runs inside the same task automatically.

Fix direction

Make ordering explicit instead of relying on when a queued callback might happen to run.

Fixed code pattern
Promise.resolve().then(handleMicrotask);
setTimeout(handleTimer, 0);
// Assert/expect the microtask before the timer.
Visual proof

The console lane proves the visible order: sync -> outer -> inner. The active line and queues show why source order changed.

How to verify in a real app

Add temporary logs around the sync line, promise callback, and timer, then confirm the order without adding arbitrary delays.

Share
Loading visual timeline...

Related cases

Continue with nearby confusion while the mental model is fresh.

Recommended next

Was this clear?

This stays local for now. It helps you track where the product still needs sharper cases.

Send detail